THE EFFECT OF FOOTSTEP STRATEGY UPON STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 5 SINGARAJA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract            The recent study aims at investigating the effect of using “Footstep Strategy†upon the students’ descriptive writing achievement of the seventh grade students of SMP Negeri 5 Singaraja in the academic year 2015/2016. To acquire the above aim of the study, a posttest only control group design was taken as the research design of the present study. The study took place in SMP N 5 Singaraja. The population was all the seventh grade students of SMP N 5 Singaraja. Based on the result of cluster random sampling, the researcher took class VIIB and VIIC as the sample of the study. Class VIIB was determined as the experimental group and VIIC as the control group. Both groups consisted of 36 students. The students of experimental group were taught to write with the guidance of “Footstep Strategyâ€, while the control group was taught by “conventional writing techniqueâ€. At the end of the experimental period, the groups were given a posttest. The result of the data analysis showed that students who were taught by using the Footstep Strategy performed better achievement that those who were taught by implementing conventional writing technique. It was shown from the mean score of the experimental group which was 75.19 and the mean score of control group was 65.00. Moreover, the result of t-test analysis showed that the to was 5.000. It was higher than the value of tcv at 1.96 (α=0.05). It indicated that the difference between the two groups was significant. In this case, the null hypothesis was rejected. In other words, there is a significant difference in the writing achievement of the seventh grade students of SMP N 5 Singaraja taught by using footstep strategy and those taught by using conventional writing technique. Keywords: Footstep strategy, descriptive writing, students’ writing achievement.
Article Details
How to Cite
TRIANA JULIARI, I. G. A. I. (2015). THE EFFECT OF FOOTSTEP STRATEGY UPON STUDENTS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING ACHIEVEMENT OF THE SEVENTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP N 5 SINGARAJA IN THE ACADEMIC YEAR 2015/2016. Widya Accarya, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.46650/wa.4.1.573.%p
Section
Articles
An author who publishes in the Widya Accarya agrees to the following terms:
- Author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Read more about the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.
References
Baley and Morgan D.H. 1996. The Action Research Planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Best, John W. 1981. Research in Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Fraenkel, J.R. and Wallen, N.E. 1993. How to Design & Evaluate Research in Education. Second Edition. New York: Mcgrow-Hill Book Co.
Gall, et all. 2002. Educational Research: An Introduction. United States. Pearson Education, Inc.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman
Hornby, A.S. 2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary: Oxford University Press
Omaggio, A.C. 1986. Teaching English in Context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle
Richards, Jack. C. and Rodgers, Theodore S. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press
Richards, Regina G. 2008. A student’s Perspective on Writing. http://www.ldonline.org/article/22746.
Best, John W. 1981. Research in Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
Fraenkel, J.R. and Wallen, N.E. 1993. How to Design & Evaluate Research in Education. Second Edition. New York: Mcgrow-Hill Book Co.
Gall, et all. 2002. Educational Research: An Introduction. United States. Pearson Education, Inc.
Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman
Hornby, A.S. 2000. Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary: Oxford University Press
Omaggio, A.C. 1986. Teaching English in Context. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle
Richards, Jack. C. and Rodgers, Theodore S. 1986. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press
Richards, Regina G. 2008. A student’s Perspective on Writing. http://www.ldonline.org/article/22746.